Wednesday, May 28, 2014

In Glengarry Glen Ross, one thing that struck me was how eager and obsessed the characters were over winning con games. At first I realized that their work was to sell crappy pieces of Floridian land and I understood why they might have to con people into thinking it was a good investment. However, I then began to realize that they manipulated not only their clients but each other as well. They were so competitive about winning the Cadillac, maintaining their jobs or just making money in general that they were willing to screw each other over, break in and steal leads, lie an enormous amount, and even resort to begging as Levene so eloquently does time and time again. The amount of conning and desperation the characters displayed in the play lead me to believe that it was not the firm itself that caused such chaos, but instead capitalism as whole.

Capitalism is defined as the competition in the market place. This helps explain why the men at Glengarry were so vivaciously over competitive. They were so career minded that they believed that winning the “competition” was the only way to maintain their jobs and livelihood. They used conning as a tool to have an edge over each other. Their job almost required them to lie to their clients in order for them to buy the land they were selling. Roma for example, was so obsessed with winning the competition that he spun a web of lies off of the top of his head to get Lingk to forget canceling his check until he legally could not. The better they were at conning, the more people would buy, and the farther ahead the men would be in winning the competition within in the story and the “competition” that defines capitalism.

Competition in the work place was so severe that the men in the story were willing to con each other and break the rules and law in order to further themselves. In the story, Arronow discusses the proposition of breaking into the office to steal leads with Moss. When Arronow disagrees, Moss cons him into being an accessory to the crime if he talks. We eventually find that Arronow is not the only one who thought about stealing leads when Williamson realizes that Levene is the one who actually stole them in the end of the story. The hunger to get ahead in the competition caused the men to think about criminal activities in the case of Moss and Arronow and incriminate themselves in the case of Levene.


Author Mamet shows how the power of capitalism creates a bread of very elaborate con men through Glengarry Glen Ross. He forces the characters in a situation where winning a competition equal the ability to be able to lie very effectively. Conning was the only way that these men saw as a way to succeed. It caused them to turn against members of their own firm and even commit acts of crime.

4 comments:

  1. In my post, I also discuss briefly the concept of capitalism in the play, and the brutal personalities the salesmen have due to this competition over the Cadillac. In hindsight, however, does anyone think that these men would have been more “honest” salesmen if they didn’t have this pressure of being on the board and “closing” every lead that they take on?
    I truly believe that if it wasn’t for this false hope that winning the Cadillac would actually mean something, then the salesmen would have been a little bit more lenient with their jobs- and perhaps maybe be good at it. I also think, that if that were the case, Roma would not be fickle minded as he was portrayed in the piece. His characteristic would completely change.
    Like you said, Mamet forces these characters into a situation where they basically have to become criminals in order to survive. It is interesting to think that if it weren't for this situation; the characteristics of our characters would have been severely altered.

    Good Job on your post

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm in the same boat with you and Chandreyee, Samantha. I also drew parallels to the capitalist system and Glengarry Glen Ross. I think the metaphor is probably too strong to really ignore.

    I have a slightly different outlook when it comes to the contest board than the two of you do, I think. In my opinion, this wasn't so much about winning a contest or a prize, it was about NOT losing. Those may sound like the same thing, but I assure you, when something as valuable as your livelihood is at stake, a car is just a car - the real prize is not being the guy on the bottom. That is the sort of thing which will drive a man to lie, cheat and steal. Fear.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I definitely see Glengarry Glen Ross as a commentary on capitalism. You’re right that the characters in this play were entirely too focused on winning the competition and keeping their jobs. Corporations and small businesses (really everybody in the workforce) compete every day to make enough money to support themselves. Every day is a new competition in the market place. Glengarry Glen Ross accurately represents this, I think. The men in this play lie, steal and cheat in order to get ahead. Isn’t that what a lot of big corporations do? We’re finally entering an age where honesty is becoming more valued in business, but a couple of decades ago the biggest trend was for companies to exaggerate their product or service in order to get more business – just like the men from the play do.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I enjoyed reading your thoughts on Glengarry Glen Ross and how it is a commentary on capitalism. Most of the other comments have already pointed out many points that I agree with. But the question I still have is, despite the negative points that this play may point out in the capitalism system, is there a better way? If all men were to receive the same leads would that be beneficial to anyone? The people who work hard at their job are rewarded less, and the people who aren't closing well, still have good leads handed to them and sometimes wasted. Though this does at least give them a shot at climbing back in to the game, which the current system shuts down completely.

    (One minor detail, I would consider moving the thesis to a little earlier in your blog.)

    ReplyDelete